Theories as structure

The Kuhn paradigms

Authors

  • Oscar Eduardo Ramón Flórez Docente de Aula Básica Primaria. Instituto Técnico Laureano Gómez. Bucaramanga - Colombia. Author
  • José Luis Restrepo Montañez José Luis Restrepo Montañez, Docente Mecánica Industrial, Coordinador Académico. Instituto Técnico Laureano Gómez. Bucaramanga - Colombia. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59654/a0vxg717

Keywords:

Teorías, paradigmas,, ciencia normal, ciencia anormal, inconmesurabilidad, revolución científica

Abstract

The article describes how a protagonist in the history of science Thomas Kuhn combined the skills of the historian and scientific knowledge to study how theories have been accepted in one historical moment of science, but in another they have been rejected and thus lost their validity. In his work Structure of Scientific Revolutions Kuhn divides science into normal and abnormal. The former is that which follows the patterns of the scientific community, corresponds to patterns and follows a paradigm in its development without discussion or doubt. Abnormal science implies an anomaly in the way of doing science that cannot be explained by normal science and this derangement of the paradigm causes another paradigm to replace it. In the structure Kuhn generates a whole revolutionary field in the philosophy of science with the study of the paradigm, he explains that several paradigms can coexist at the same time until a revolution is generated and consequently a substitution of the paradigm. However, a new paradigm is not comparable with the old paradigm; in this sense, Kuhn proposes the incommensurability of paradigms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Oscar Eduardo Ramón Flórez, Docente de Aula Básica Primaria. Instituto Técnico Laureano Gómez. Bucaramanga - Colombia.

    Magister en Educación. Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia: Bogotá DC, Bogotá, Colombia.

  • José Luis Restrepo Montañez, José Luis Restrepo Montañez, Docente Mecánica Industrial, Coordinador Académico. Instituto Técnico Laureano Gómez. Bucaramanga - Colombia.

    Magister en Educación. Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia: Bogotá DC, Bogotá, Colombia.

References

Carrier, M. (2008). The aim and structure of methodological theory. In L. Soler, H. Sankey, & P. Hoyningen-Huene (Eds.), Rethinking scientifc change and theory comparison: Stabilities, ruptures, incommensurabilities? (pp. 273–290). Springer.

Chalmers, A. F. (1982). Qué es esa cosa llamada ciencia. Siglo Veintiuno de España editores, S.A.

Kuhn, T. S. (1971). Estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Objectivity, value judgement and theory choice. Reprinted in Kuhn, T. (Ed.). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientifc tradition and change (pp. 320–339). University of Chicago Press

Popper, K. R. (1980). La lógica de la investigación científica. (5a reimpresión). Tecnos.

Solís, S. C. (1998). Alta tensión: Historia, filosofía y sociología. Paidós. http://josemramon.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/Solis-Santos-Alta-tensi%C3%B3n.Historia-filosofia-y-sociologia-de-la-ciencia.pd

Published

2023-06-15

Issue

Section

Artículos De Revisi´ón

How to Cite

Ramón Flórez, O. E. ., & Restrepo Montañez, J. L. . (2023). Theories as structure: The Kuhn paradigms. Revista Digital De Investigación Y Postgrado, 4(8), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.59654/a0vxg717

Similar Articles

21-30 of 68

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.