The ontological eidos of transcomplexity

An epistemic amalgam between thought, reality and language

Authors

  • Antonio María Balza Laya Docente jubilado de la Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez. San Juan de Los Morros, Venezuela. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59654/12tx3w88

Keywords:

Ontological eidos, transcomplexity, thinking and thinking, multiverse reality, discourse and translanguage.

Abstract

The epistemic claim to articulate some gnoseological categories constitutive of the ontological eidos of transcomplexity, constitutes a fascinating intellectual adventure, since it implies an argumentative assessment
of the ontological relationality involved between thought, reality and language. In these grounds of knowledge the present scientific work is located, which was drawn as cardinal teleology, to reflect in depth about the epistemic amalgam between thought, reality and language as a purpose to build the ontological eidos of transcomplexity. Methodologically, epistemological theoretical reflection is developed from a dialectical and transformational hermeneutical perspective, which reaches the argumentative articulation of a set of provisional epistemic premises, understood as the genealogical nucleus
of a transepistemology under construction. These premises are: the principles of the Transcomplex Integrative Approach, the philosophical dimensions of the epistemic matrix of transcomplexity, the portals
of human wisdom for a transcomplex thinker and the coherence bet ween the grammatical categories that support a translanguage of a recursive and transformational nature. Theoretically, the article is based on the Ontological Semantic Theory of Truth by Lorenz Puntel (2009). In this way, the scientific discourse about the transepistemology of transcomplexity must be based on a triple coherence of truth: semantic coherence, syntagmatic coherence and argumentative coherence, since the latter allows us to appreciate the new built knowledge; Furthermore, the ontological eidos of transcomplexity must be nourished by the alchemy of complexity, the concurrent gnoseological substances of transdisciplinarity
and the enigmas of the logic of the third included.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Antonio María Balza Laya, Docente jubilado de la Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez. San Juan de Los Morros, Venezuela.

    Doctor en Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad Santa María, Caracas - Venezuela. Postdoctor en Educación, Universidad Bicentenaria de Aragua (UBA), Maracay, Aragua - Venezuela. Postdoctor en Investigación Transcompleja, UBA, Maracay, Aragua - Venezuela. Magister en Economía, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas - Venezuela. Economista, Universidad de Carabobo, Valencia, Carabobo - Venezuela. Email: balzaholociencia@gmail.com

References

Balza, L. A. M. (2013). Pensar la Investigación Postdoctoral desde una Perspectiva Transcompleja. REDIT. Maracay - Venezuela.

Balza, L. A. M. (2019). La Transcomplejidad. Un Modo de Pensar y Comprender la Trama de la Vida del Ser Humano. Editorial Académica Española, Mauritius.

Camana, R. (2016). ¿Cuál es el Objetivo de la Escritura Científica? https://robertocamana.wordpress.com/2016/10/25/objetivo-escritura-cientifica/

Corvallis, M (2016). La Recursividad del Pensamiento. https://filosofia.laguia2000.com/filosofia-y-antropologia/la-recursividad

Collado, S. (2007). La Emergencia de la Libertad. En Themata. Revista de Filosofía 38, 7007. Universidad de Navarra, España.

Hegel, G. (1817). Pensamiento y Realidad. Editorial Universidad Francisco de Victoria.

Morín, E. (2002). La Lógica del Tercer incluido. http://www.edgarmorin.org/blog/42-epistemologia/438-tercero-incluido.html.

Roche de la Torre, A. (2005). Más allá de la Palabra. El lenguaje en la filosofía de Heidegger. https://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0798-11712005000100001

Romero, J. (2009). Teoría Semántica Ontológica de la Verdad. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41220918

Schavino, N. (2012). El Enfoque Integrador Transcomplejo y la Investigación Educativa. En: La Transcomplejidad una nueva visión. REDIT, Maracay, Venezuela.

Schavino, N. (2017). Epistemología del Enfoque Integrador Transcomplejo. pp,135- 145 En: Villegas C. Col. Investigación Transcompleja: De la Discimplicidad a la Transdisciplinariedad. Universidad Bicentenaria de Aragua.

Salazar, S. (2012). Reflexiones sobre el Uso del Lenguaje en la Investigación Transcompleja. En La Transcomplejidad. Una nueva Visión, Ediciones REDIT.

Zaá, J. (2020). La Transcomplejidad desde la Filosofía. https://reditve.wordpress.com/2020/02/21/transcomplejidad-desde-la-filosofia/

Published

2021-06-04

Issue

Section

Artículos Científicos

How to Cite

Balza Laya, A. M. . (2021). The ontological eidos of transcomplexity: An epistemic amalgam between thought, reality and language. Revista Digital De Investigación Y Postgrado, 2(3), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.59654/12tx3w88

Similar Articles

1-10 of 67

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.