189
Global, national, local, and institutional realities now demand transformative university education
that enhances personal development as thinking, rational beings while preparing technically skilled
professionals. We must move beyond traditional models toward critical reflection on teaching-
learning processes that recognize students' competencies, skills, talents, aptitudes, and virtues.
Regarding this, Zhizhko (2017) states that at the university level, competency-based education
demands that these competencies be articulated with experience. However, the task is not easy
to achieve; it requires incorporating experience into the educational process itself without di-
minishing the student's way of seeing and explaining the world or realities.
Nevertheless, it is necessary to highlight the need to promote this methodology because clas-
srooms continue to show academically developing students working under an advising, men-
toring, and guidance model that leads to developing an archaic, behaviorist, repetitive, and
unproductive learning system; one that neither helps them think nor understand nor resolve si-
tuations required of university students. In other words, a discriminatory form of teaching is
being developed, as it restricts students from producing knowledge from their own perspective,
instead making them reproduce others' thinking, isolating them from critical, eclectic, and holistic
knowledge.
In this sense, it is a priority to promote this methodological approach, given that classrooms
still maintain advising and mentoring models based on archaic, behaviorist, repetitive, and un-
productive learning schemes. These models do not foster reflection or understanding, let alone
autonomous problem-solving. Consequently, they continue to promote limited and discrimi-
natory teaching that inhibits students from producing knowledge from their own perspective,
subjecting them to reproduce others' thinking and distancing them from critical, eclectic, and
holistic knowledge.
In other words, it is necessary to materialize a university education focused on understanding
what and how the student learns, so that they consolidate into a living resource, opportunity,
or tool that serves all actors in the educational process, and so that the full development of
everyone's capacities, gifts, potential, skills, competencies, and virtues is achieved, while simul-
taneously promoting a professional future that is competent to make decisions based on the
achievements and aspirations of the very protagonist who seeks to develop it. In this way, as
Lora (2020, p. 84) states, competencies should focus on "what one can do, what one knows
how to do, and what one has the will to do (Being, Doing, Knowing-How)." Without neglecting
what Rodríguez (2003, p. 82) pointed out: "to stay up to date on relevant topics and provide
criteria for validating knowledge."
In this line of thought, a university professor with competitive qualities who teaches within their
area of training expertise is required. Ideally, they should begin by manifesting themselves in
doing, being, seeking, coexisting, and feeling as a competent professor. That is to say, they
should promote, practice, and demonstrate competency-based teaching. This call has been
made for several years. Thus, Ortega y Gasset (1976, p. 49) said: "...one should only teach what
Revista Digital de Investigación y Postgrado, 6(12), 187-195
Electronic ISSSN: 2665-038X
Challenges faced by teachers when guiding competitive
learning in areas outside their field of expertise